State ex rel. Fortenberry v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Fortenberry v. State

58 So. 3d 464, 2011 La. LEXIS 621, 2011 WL 1466476

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMarch 4, 2011

DocketNo. 2010-KH-0600

StatusPublished

This text of 58 So. 3d 464 (State ex rel. Fortenberry v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Fortenberry v. State, 58 So. 3d 464, 2011 La. LEXIS 621, 2011 WL 1466476 (La. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Fortenberry, Rodney; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Washington, 22nd Judicial District Court Div. F, No. 94,157; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2009 CA 0822.

Writ granted in part; otherwise denied. The Franklinton Police Department is ordered to provide relator with an estimate of the costs of reproducing public records relator has requested and to which relator is entitled. La. Const, art. XII, section 3; R.S. 44:31; R.S. 44:31.1; State ex rel. Barbee v. State, 10-0275 (La.2/4/11), 57 So.3d 318; State ex rel Leonard v. State, 96-1889 (La.6/13/97), 695 So.2d 1325; State ex rel. Level v. State, 99-2266 (La.12/17/99), 751 So.2d 869; Range v. Moreau, 96-1607 (La.9/3/96), 678 So.2d 537. In all other respects, the application is denied.

CLARK, J., would deny.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Fortenberry, Rodney; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Washington, 22nd Judicial District Court Div. F, No. 94,157; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2009 CA 0822.

Writ granted in part; otherwise denied. The Franklinton Police Department is ordered to provide relator with an estimate of the costs of reproducing public records relator has requested and to which relator is entitled. La. Const, art. XII, section 3; R.S. 44:31; R.S. 44:31.1; State ex rel. Barbee v. State, 10-0275 (La.2/4/11), 57 So.3d 318; State ex rel Leonard v. State, 96-1889 (La.6/13/97), 695 So.2d 1325; State ex rel. Level v. State, 99-2266 (La.12/17/99), 751 So.2d 869; Range v. Moreau, 96-1607 (La.9/3/96), 678 So.2d 537. In all other respects, the application is denied.

CLARK, J., would deny.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

58 So. 3d 464, 2011 La. LEXIS 621, 2011 WL 1466476, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-fortenberry-v-state-la-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack