State ex rel. Foret v. Cain
This text of 505 So. 2d 1139 (State ex rel. Foret v. Cain) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In re Foret, Anthony; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, writ of supervisory; Parish of St. Mary, 16th Judicial District Court, Div. “E”, No. 115956.
Denied. If relator wishes a determination of the merits of his claim that he was denied an appeal as a result of counsel’s failure to act in accordance with his expressed desire to appeal, he should present that claim to the district court. Relator should use the uniform application for post conviction relief, as required by La.C.Cr.P. art. 926 D, and may wish to state in the application the reason why the claim was not included in his prior application. See, La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 F.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
505 So. 2d 1139, 1987 La. LEXIS 9124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-foret-v-cain-la-1987.