State ex rel. Foret v. Cain

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Foret v. Cain

505 So. 2d 1139, 1987 La. LEXIS 9124

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided May 8, 1987·No. No. 87-KH-0439·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In re Foret, Anthony; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, writ of supervisory; Parish of St. Mary, 16th Judicial District Court, Div. “E”, No. 115956.

Denied. If relator wishes a determination of the merits of his claim that he was denied an appeal as a result of counsel’s failure to act in accordance with his expressed desire to appeal, he should present that claim to the district court. Relator should use the uniform application for post conviction relief, as required by La.C.Cr.P. art. 926 D, and may wish to state in the application the reason why the claim was not included in his prior application. See, La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 F.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Foret, Anthony; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, writ of supervisory; Parish of St. Mary, 16th Judicial District Court, Div. “E”, No. 115956.

Denied. If relator wishes a determination of the merits of his claim that he was denied an appeal as a result of counsel’s failure to act in accordance with his expressed desire to appeal, he should present that claim to the district court. Relator should use the uniform application for post conviction relief, as required by La.C.Cr.P. art. 926 D, and may wish to state in the application the reason why the claim was not included in his prior application. See, La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 F.

State ex rel. Foret v. Cain, 505 So. 2d 1139, 1987 La. LEXIS 9124 (La. 1987).

Pincite

505 So. 2d 1139 (State ex rel. Foret v. Cain) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related