State ex rel. Foreman v. City Council of Bellefontaine

205 N.E.2d 398, 1 Ohio St. 2d 132, 30 Ohio Op. 2d 485, 1965 Ohio LEXIS 580
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 10, 1965·No. No. 38851·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

An examination of the amended petition shows that nowhere therein, either in the first or second cause of action, does appellant allege that he exhausted or attempted to exhaust his administrative remedies by appeal to the Board of Zoning Appeals. The exhaustion of administrative remedies is a condition precedent which must be fulfilled before one may resort to the courts to compel the issuance of a permit for a nonconforming use under a zoning ordinance or before the constitutionality of the ordinance may be attacked. State, ex rel. Lieux, v. City of Westlake, 154 Ohio St. 412, 96 N. E. 2d 414.

Judgment affirmed.

Taft, C. J., Zimmebman, Matthias, O’Neill, Heebeet, Schneidee and Bbown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Foreman v. City Council of Bellefontaine, 205 N.E.2d 398, 1 Ohio St. 2d 132, 30 Ohio Op. 2d 485, 1965 Ohio LEXIS 580 (Ohio 1965).

205 N.E.2d 398 (State ex rel. Foreman v. City Council of Bellefontaine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Cotterman v. St. Marys Foundry
544 N.E.2d 887 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1989)
Driscoll v. Austintown Associates
328 N.E.2d 395 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1975)
Van Curen v. Village of Mayfield
318 N.E.2d 550 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1974)
Kaufman v. Village of Newburgh Heights
271 N.E.2d 280 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1971)
Burt Realty Corp. v. City of Columbus
257 N.E.2d 355 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1970)
Cook-Johnson Realty Co. v. Bertolini
239 N.E.2d 80 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1968)
State Ex Rel. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. City of Marion
211 N.E.2d 667 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1965)