State Ex Rel. Ford Motor Co., Sharonville Transmission Plant v. Johnson

2009 Ohio 4049, 912 N.E.2d 1131, 122 Ohio St. 3d 540
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 18, 2009
Docket2008-2220
StatusPublished

This text of 2009 Ohio 4049 (State Ex Rel. Ford Motor Co., Sharonville Transmission Plant v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Ex Rel. Ford Motor Co., Sharonville Transmission Plant v. Johnson, 2009 Ohio 4049, 912 N.E.2d 1131, 122 Ohio St. 3d 540 (Ohio 2009).

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. *541 Harris & Burgin, Andrea L. Burns, and Jonathan W. Croft, for appellee Emma R. Johnson. Richard Cordray, Attorney General, and Douglas R. Unver, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2009 Ohio 4049, 912 N.E.2d 1131, 122 Ohio St. 3d 540, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-ford-motor-co-sharonville-transmission-plant-v-johnson-ohio-2009.