State ex rel. Florida Bar v. Van Deventer

Supreme Court of Florida

State ex rel. Florida Bar v. Van Deventer

145 So. 2d 491

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedOctober 10, 1962

DocketNo. 31915

StatusPublished

This text of 145 So. 2d 491 (State ex rel. Florida Bar v. Van Deventer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Florida Bar v. Van Deventer, 145 So. 2d 491 (Fla. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Board of Governors of The Florida Bar, on July 24th, 1962, filed its judgment recommending certain disciplinary action against the respondent, Keith Van Deventer, a member of The Florida Bar.

The accused lawyer has not sought review of the judgment as permitted by Rule 11.11 of the Integration Rule governing The Florida Bar, 31 F.S.A. The judgment of the Board of Governors of The Florida Bar is therefore approved.

Consistent with the findings and recommendation of the Board of Governors, the respondent, Keith Van Deventer, is suspended from the practice of law in Florida for a period of three months commencing on the date of the filing of this decision and thereafter until he demonstrates to the Board of Governors and to this Court that he is entitled to be reinstated in accordance with the provisions of Rule 11.10 of the Integration Rule, and further, until he has made full restitution to his clients for the money shown to have been misappropriated, and further, until he has paid the costs of these proceedings in the amount of $61.14.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C. J., and TERRELL, THOMAS, DREW and THORNAL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The Board of Governors of The Florida Bar, on July 24th, 1962, filed its judgment recommending certain disciplinary action against the respondent, Keith Van Deventer, a member of The Florida Bar.

The accused lawyer has not sought review of the judgment as permitted by Rule 11.11 of the Integration Rule governing The Florida Bar, 31 F.S.A. The judgment of the Board of Governors of The Florida Bar is therefore approved.

Consistent with the findings and recommendation of the Board of Governors, the respondent, Keith Van Deventer, is suspended from the practice of law in Florida for a period of three months commencing on the date of the filing of this decision and thereafter until he demonstrates to the Board of Governors and to this Court that he is entitled to be reinstated in accordance with the provisions of Rule 11.10 of the Integration Rule, and further, until he has made full restitution to his clients for the money shown to have been misappropriated, and further, until he has paid the costs of these proceedings in the amount of $61.14.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C. J., and TERRELL, THOMAS, DREW and THORNAL, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

145 So. 2d 491, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-florida-bar-v-van-deventer-fla-1962.