State ex rel. Florida Bar v. Stein

Supreme Court of Florida

State ex rel. Florida Bar v. Stein

153 So. 2d 301, 1963 Fla. LEXIS 3219

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedMay 15, 1963

DocketNo. 31914

StatusPublished

This text of 153 So. 2d 301 (State ex rel. Florida Bar v. Stein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Florida Bar v. Stein, 153 So. 2d 301, 1963 Fla. LEXIS 3219 (Fla. 1963).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

This is a disciplinary proceeding prosecuted pursuant to Article XI, Integration Rule of The Florida Bar, 31 F.S.A. We are confronted with the petition of respondent to review the judgment of the Board of Governors of the Florida Bar filed July 21, 1962, and also with a sworn letter of retraction by a complaining witness which was received by this court after full consideration of the matter by the Board of Governors and after oral argument before this court.

In view of the retraction and recalcitration of a primary witness it is ordered that this record be remanded to the Board of Governors for further consideration, with authority to make such changes as they may deem appropriate.

ROBERTS, C. J., and THOMAS, THOR-NAL and O’DONNELL, JJ., concur. TERRELL, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is a disciplinary proceeding prosecuted pursuant to Article XI, Integration Rule of The Florida Bar, 31 F.S.A. We are confronted with the petition of respondent to review the judgment of the Board of Governors of the Florida Bar filed July 21, 1962, and also with a sworn letter of retraction by a complaining witness which was received by this court after full consideration of the matter by the Board of Governors and after oral argument before this court.

In view of the retraction and recalcitration of a primary witness it is ordered that this record be remanded to the Board of Governors for further consideration, with authority to make such changes as they may deem appropriate.

ROBERTS, C. J., and THOMAS, THOR-NAL and O’DONNELL, JJ., concur. TERRELL, J., dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

153 So. 2d 301, 1963 Fla. LEXIS 3219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-florida-bar-v-stein-fla-1963.