State ex rel. Florida Bar v. Everett

111 So. 2d 425, 1959 Fla. LEXIS 1630
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided April 29, 1959·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The respondent, George B. Everett, petitioned this court for appellate review of the judgment of the Board of Governors. The Integration Rule, Article XI, subd. 5(e), 31 F.S.A.

By its judgment, the Board of Governors of The Florida Bar disbarred the respondent and petitioned this court to assess actual costs in the amount of $671.58 against respondent.

We have carefully reviewed the record in this cause and find that the respondent has failed to establish that the judgment is erroneous, unlawful, or unjustified.

The judgment of the Board of Governors of The Florida Bar is approved, the name of the respondent, George B. Everett, is hereby stricken from the rolls of The Florida Bar, and costs of $671.58 are hereby assessed against the respondent, George B. Everett, for which let execution issue.

It is so ordered.

TPIOMAS, Acting C. J., HOBSON, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., and' TAYLOR, Circuit Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Florida Bar v. Everett, 111 So. 2d 425, 1959 Fla. LEXIS 1630 (Fla. 1959).

111 So. 2d 425 (State ex rel. Florida Bar v. Everett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Florida Bar v. Rubin
142 So. 2d 65 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1962)