State ex rel. Florence v. Zitter
This text of 824 N.E.2d 89 (State ex rel. Florence v. Zitter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition and was considered in a manner prescribed by law. Upon consideration of respondent’s motion to dismiss or, alternatively, motion for summary judgment,
IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that an alternative writ be, and hereby is, granted and the following briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. X:
The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present within 20 days of the date of this entry; relator shall file her brief within 10 days after the filing of evidence; respondent shall file her brief within 20 days after the filing of relator’s brief; and relator may file a reply brief within 5 days after the filing of respondent’s brief.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the motion to dismiss and motion for summary judgment be, and hereby are, denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
824 N.E.2d 89, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1460, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-florence-v-zitter-ohio-2005.