State Ex Rel. Five Transportation Co. v. Lee

191 So. 10, 139 Fla. 835
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State Ex Rel. Five Transportation Co. v. Lee. Read the opinion of the Court — 132 Fla. 183
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 25, 1939·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This case is before us for consideration pursuant to oral argument after rehearing was granted pursuant to our opinion and judgment filed and entered January 5, 1938 (181 So. 179), to allow relators to join issue on affirmative allegations of answer and to take testimony before a commissioner appointed for that purpose.

Plaving considered the record as it now appears, we find the allegations of the answer sufficient and supported by the evidence taken. So the alternative writ is quashed on authority-of our former opinion, supra.

So ordered.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Buford and Thomas, J. J. concur. Justice Brown not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State Ex Rel. Five Transportation Co. v. Lee, 191 So. 10, 139 Fla. 835 (Fla. 1939).

191 So. 10 (State Ex Rel. Five Transportation Co. v. Lee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Five Transportation Co. v. Lee
181 So. 179 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1938)