State Ex Rel. Five Transportation Co. v. Lee

191 So. 10, 139 Fla. 835
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJuly 25, 1939
StatusPublished

This text of 191 So. 10 (State Ex Rel. Five Transportation Co. v. Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Ex Rel. Five Transportation Co. v. Lee, 191 So. 10, 139 Fla. 835 (Fla. 1939).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This case is before us for consideration pursuant to oral argument after rehearing was granted pursuant to our opinion and judgment filed and entered January 5, 1938 (181 So. 179), to allow relators to join issue on affirmative allegations of answer and to take testimony before a commissioner appointed for that purpose.

Plaving considered the record as it now appears, we find the allegations of the answer sufficient and supported by the evidence taken. So the alternative writ is quashed on authority-of our former opinion, supra.

So ordered.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Buford and Thomas, J. J. concur. Justice Brown not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Ex Rel. Five Transportation Co. v. Lee
181 So. 179 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
191 So. 10, 139 Fla. 835, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-five-transportation-co-v-lee-fla-1939.