State Ex Rel. Fish v. Industrial Commission
This text of 177 N.E. 766 (State Ex Rel. Fish v. Industrial Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
During the course of the argument it developed that the Industrial Commission had not made such disposition of the matter as to permit relator to appeal to the common pleas court, and the cause was therefore held in abeyance to permit further proceedings before the Industrial Commission to obviate that difficulty. Since the submission of the cause in this court the Industrial Commission has granted the claimant a rehearing, and the cause has therefore become moot in this court. The relief prayed for must, therefore, be denied on authority of Miner v. Witt, 82 Ohio St., 237.
Writ denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
177 N.E. 766, 123 Ohio St. 678, 123 Ohio St. (N.S.) 678, 1931 Ohio LEXIS 378, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-fish-v-industrial-commission-ohio-1931.