State Ex Rel. Fish v. Industrial Commission
Opinion
During the course of the argument it developed that the Industrial Commission had not made such disposition of the matter as to permit relator to appeal to the common pleas court, and the cause was therefore held in abeyance to permit further proceedings before the Industrial Commission to obviate that difficulty. Since the submission of the cause in this court the Industrial Commission has granted the claimant a rehearing, and the cause has therefore become moot in this court. The relief prayed for must, therefore, be denied on authority of Miner v. Witt, 82 Ohio St., 237.
Writ denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
177 N.E. 766 (State Ex Rel. Fish v. Industrial Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.