State ex rel. Finley v. Pfeiffer

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Finley v. Pfeiffer

165 Ohio St. (N.S.) 496

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided October 17, 1956·No. No. 34809·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

There being no bill of exceptions, this court cannot say that there was not substantial evidence warranting the Court of Appeals in the conclusions reached by it. On appeal on questions of law all reasonable presumptions consistent with the record will be indulged in favor of the validity of the judgment under review and of the regularity and legality of the proceedings below.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

■Weygandt, C. J., Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman, Stewart, Bell and Taet, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

There being no bill of exceptions, this court cannot say that there was not substantial evidence warranting the Court of Appeals in the conclusions reached by it. On appeal on questions of law all reasonable presumptions consistent with the record will be indulged in favor of the validity of the judgment under review and of the regularity and legality of the proceedings below.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

■Weygandt, C. J., Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman, Stewart, Bell and Taet, JJ., concur.

State ex rel. Finley v. Pfeiffer, 165 Ohio St. (N.S.) 496 (Ohio 1956).

Pincite

165 Ohio St. (N.S.) 496 (State ex rel. Finley v. Pfeiffer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.