State ex rel. Finlen v. District Court of the Second Judicial District

71 P. 1131, 26 Mont. 548, 1901 Mont. LEXIS 123
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State ex rel. Finlen v. District Court of the Second Judicial District. Read the opinion of the Court — 26 Mont. 372
Montana Supreme Court·Decided October 10, 1901·No. No. 1,726·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

— Relator’s application for a writ of supervisory control herein is denied.

(Mr. Justice Pigott is of the opinion that the application should be set for hearing, and therefore dissents from this order.)

On petition for reheating.

Decided October 22, 1902.

— The petition for a reheating herein is denied. (Mr. Justice Milburn concurring upon the ground that the petition does not state facts sufficient to warrant the issuance of the writ prayed for. Mr. Justice Pigott is of the opinion that the application for a writ of supervisory control should be heard, and therefore dissents from the order denying the motion for a reconsideration.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Finlen v. District Court of the Second Judicial District, 71 P. 1131, 26 Mont. 548, 1901 Mont. LEXIS 123 (Mo. 1901).

71 P. 1131 (State ex rel. Finlen v. District Court of the Second Judicial District) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.