State ex rel. Finlen v. District Court of the Second Judicial District

71 P. 1131, 26 Mont. 548, 1901 Mont. LEXIS 123
CourtMontana Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 10, 1901
DocketNo. 1,726
StatusPublished

This text of 71 P. 1131 (State ex rel. Finlen v. District Court of the Second Judicial District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Finlen v. District Court of the Second Judicial District, 71 P. 1131, 26 Mont. 548, 1901 Mont. LEXIS 123 (Mo. 1901).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

— Relator’s application for a writ of supervisory control herein is denied.

(Mr. Justice Pigott is of the opinion that the application should be set for hearing, and therefore dissents from this order.)

On petition for reheating.

Decided October 22, 1902.

— The petition for a reheating herein is denied. (Mr. Justice Milburn concurring upon the ground that the petition does not state facts sufficient to warrant the issuance of the writ prayed for. Mr. Justice Pigott is of the opinion that the application for a writ of supervisory control should be heard, and therefore dissents from the order denying the motion for a reconsideration.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
71 P. 1131, 26 Mont. 548, 1901 Mont. LEXIS 123, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-finlen-v-district-court-of-the-second-judicial-district-mont-1901.