State ex rel. Finfrock v. Foley

634 N.E.2d 1027, 69 Ohio St. 3d 1481, 1994 Ohio LEXIS 1463
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided July 6, 1994·No. 94-914·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In Mandamus. On motion for summary judgment. Motion treated as motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., AW. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Finfrock v. Foley, 634 N.E.2d 1027, 69 Ohio St. 3d 1481, 1994 Ohio LEXIS 1463 (Ohio 1994).

634 N.E.2d 1027 (State ex rel. Finfrock v. Foley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

R.L.R. Invests., L.L.C. v. Wilmington Horsemens Group, L.L.C.
2014 Ohio 4757 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2014)
Grenga v. Bank One, Unpublished Decision (8-26-2005)
2005 Ohio 4474 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2005)