State ex rel. Finding v. Kohler

28 Ohio C.C. Dec. 284, 18 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 465
CourtCuyahoga Circuit Court
DecidedMarch 20, 1911
StatusPublished

This text of 28 Ohio C.C. Dec. 284 (State ex rel. Finding v. Kohler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Cuyahoga Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Finding v. Kohler, 28 Ohio C.C. Dec. 284, 18 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 465 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1911).

Opinion

WINCH, J.

While the chief of police of the city of Cleveland is invested by the statutes and police regulations with ample discretionary powers for disciplining his subordinates, the plain provisions of See. 4380 G. C. require that when suspension is any part of the punishment denounced by him, he shall forthwith in writing certify such fact together with the cause therefor to the director of public safety, who, within five days from the receipt thereof, shall proceed to inquire into the cause of such suspension and render judgment thereon. A peremptory writ to that end will issue in this ease. The injunction prayed for is denied.

Henry and Marvin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 Ohio C.C. Dec. 284, 18 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 465, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-finding-v-kohler-ohcirctcuyahoga-1911.