State ex rel. Filkill v. Indus. Comm.

1998 Ohio 355, 84 Ohio St. 3d 111

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 84 Ohio St.3d 111.]

THE STATE EX REL. FILKILL, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Filkill v. Indus. Comm., 1998-Ohio-355.] Workers’ compensation--Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 98-744–Submitted October 12, 1998–Decided December 9, 1998.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 97APD04-559. __________________ Law Office of Thomas Tootle and Thomas Tootle, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Michael A. Vanderhorst, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, RESNICK and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., dissent. __________________ ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and enter judgment pursuant to State ex rel. Gay v. Mihm (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 315, 626 N.E.2d 666. DOUGLAS and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion. __________________