State ex rel. Field v. Saxton
Opinion
By the Court,
The motion made in this case by the respondent, to quash the alternative writ, must be denied. Proceedings by a writ of mandamus is the proper remedy to compel a sheriff, or other county officer, to keep his office at the county seat. In answer to such an action commenced by an alternative writ, the respondent may set up as a defense, that the county seat has not been removed from one place to another, by a vote of the people; or any other proper defense which he may have to the action. There is no more proper manner to test the validity of an election to remove a county seat, than by proceedings in mandamus. It is the remedy which has frequently been pursued in this state.
* The respondent may have leave to file an answer within three days.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
11 Wis. 27 (State ex rel. Field v. Saxton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.