State ex rel. Federle v. Warren Cty. Bd. of Elections

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Federle v. Warren Cty. Bd. of Elections

116 N.E.3d 151, 2019 Ohio 221, 154 Ohio St. 3d 1496

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided January 25, 2019·No. 2019-0104·Published

Opinion

MISCELLANEOUS ORDERS

In Mandamus and Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for writs of mandamus and prohibition involving an expedited election matter. On review of the complaint, it is evident that this case was filed more than 90 days prior to the next election and thus is not an expedited election case. However, the case shall still proceed pursuant to the schedule set forth in S.Ct.Prac.R. 12.08.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MISCELLANEOUS ORDERS

In Mandamus and Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for writs of mandamus and prohibition involving an expedited election matter. On review of the complaint, it is evident that this case was filed more than 90 days prior to the next election and thus is not an expedited election case. However, the case shall still proceed pursuant to the schedule set forth in S.Ct.Prac.R. 12.08.

State ex rel. Federle v. Warren Cty. Bd. of Elections, 116 N.E.3d 151, 2019 Ohio 221, 154 Ohio St. 3d 1496 (Ohio 2019).

Pincite

116 N.E.3d 151 (State ex rel. Federle v. Warren Cty. Bd. of Elections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.