State ex rel. Federle v. Warren Cty. Bd. of Elections

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Federle v. Warren Cty. Bd. of Elections

116 N.E.3d 151, 2019 Ohio 221, 154 Ohio St. 3d 1496

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 25, 2019

Docket2019-0104

StatusPublished

This text of 116 N.E.3d 151 (State ex rel. Federle v. Warren Cty. Bd. of Elections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Federle v. Warren Cty. Bd. of Elections, 116 N.E.3d 151, 2019 Ohio 221, 154 Ohio St. 3d 1496 (Ohio 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

MISCELLANEOUS ORDERS

In Mandamus and Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for writs of mandamus and prohibition involving an expedited election matter. On review of the complaint, it is evident that this case was filed more than 90 days prior to the next election and thus is not an expedited election case. However, the case shall still proceed pursuant to the schedule set forth in S.Ct.Prac.R. 12.08.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MISCELLANEOUS ORDERS

In Mandamus and Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for writs of mandamus and prohibition involving an expedited election matter. On review of the complaint, it is evident that this case was filed more than 90 days prior to the next election and thus is not an expedited election case. However, the case shall still proceed pursuant to the schedule set forth in S.Ct.Prac.R. 12.08.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

116 N.E.3d 151, 2019 Ohio 221, 154 Ohio St. 3d 1496, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-federle-v-warren-cty-bd-of-elections-ohio-2019.