State ex rel. Favorite v. Slauter
This text of 80 Ind. 597 (State ex rel. Favorite v. Slauter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— This is a suit by appellant, as guardian, upon the bond of appellee, as former guardian of the same wards. The complaint shows that appellee, as such former guardian, filed an account current of his receipts and disbursements, together with his resignation, upon which he was discharged by the court.
This settlement and discharge are res adjudicata of all the matters and things therein contained, and can not be collaterally attacked in a suit upon the bond. The report can only be set aside by a direct proceeding for that purpose. See the case of Candy v. Hanmore, 76 Ind. 125, and the authorities therein cited.
A direct proceeding was commenced to set aside this settlement, and in the case of Favorite v. Slauter, 79 Ind. 5,62, this court held that the complaint therein was sufficient, and reversed the judgment.
This leaves the whole matter open for examination in the court below, and, if there is anything wrong in the settlement, it can be set aside, and, if necessary, then a proper suit upon the bond can be commenced.
There was no error in sustaining the demurrer to the complaint in this case.
The judgment below ought to be affirmed.
Per Curiam. — It is therefore ordered, upon the foregoing opinion, that the judgment below be and it is in all things affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
80 Ind. 597, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-favorite-v-slauter-ind-1881.