State ex rel. Farris v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Farris v. State

805 So. 2d 187, 1998 La. LEXIS 1187, 1998 WL 231436

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMay 1, 1998

DocketNo. 97-KH-2818

StatusPublished

This text of 805 So. 2d 187 (State ex rel. Farris v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Farris v. State, 805 So. 2d 187, 1998 La. LEXIS 1187, 1998 WL 231436 (La. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Farris, Terry; — Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writ; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Nos. KW96-1585, KW93-1555, KW93-1121; Parish of Allen 33rd Judicial District Court Nos. CR2058, CR2059-83.

Writ granted in part. If he has not done so already, the district attorney is ordered to provide relator with an estimate of the costs of reproducing public records relator has requested and to which relator is entitled. La. Const, art. XII, Section 3; R.S. 44:31; Range v. Moreau, 96-1607 (La.9/3/96), 678 So.2d 537. In all other respects, the application is denied. State ex rel. Bernard v. Cr.D.C., 94-2247, p. 1 (La.4/28/95), 653 So.2d 1174, 1175; State ex rel. Fleury v. State, 93-2898 (La.10/13/95), 661 So.2d 488; R.S. 44:31; R.S. 44:35; State ex rel. Nodier v. State, 98-0636 (La.3/27/98), 716 So.2d 896.

CALOGERO, C.J. not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Farris, Terry; — Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writ; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Nos. KW96-1585, KW93-1555, KW93-1121; Parish of Allen 33rd Judicial District Court Nos. CR2058, CR2059-83.

Writ granted in part. If he has not done so already, the district attorney is ordered to provide relator with an estimate of the costs of reproducing public records relator has requested and to which relator is entitled. La. Const, art. XII, Section 3; R.S. 44:31; Range v. Moreau, 96-1607 (La.9/3/96), 678 So.2d 537. In all other respects, the application is denied. State ex rel. Bernard v. Cr.D.C., 94-2247, p. 1 (La.4/28/95), 653 So.2d 1174, 1175; State ex rel. Fleury v. State, 93-2898 (La.10/13/95), 661 So.2d 488; R.S. 44:31; R.S. 44:35; State ex rel. Nodier v. State, 98-0636 (La.3/27/98), 716 So.2d 896.

CALOGERO, C.J. not on panel.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

805 So. 2d 187, 1998 La. LEXIS 1187, 1998 WL 231436, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-farris-v-state-la-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack