State ex rel. Farrell v. Pepsi Cola Bottling Co.

48 N.W.2d 564, 234 Minn. 466, 1951 Minn. LEXIS 727
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedJune 29, 1951
DocketNo. 35,512
StatusPublished

This text of 48 N.W.2d 564 (State ex rel. Farrell v. Pepsi Cola Bottling Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Farrell v. Pepsi Cola Bottling Co., 48 N.W.2d 564, 234 Minn. 466, 1951 Minn. LEXIS 727 (Mich. 1951).

Opinion

Magnet, Justice.

This is a companion case to Costello v. Farrell, 234 Minn. 453, 48 N. W. (2d) 557, filed herewith. The facts are the same. In the instant case, relator, Esther J. Farrell, one of the defendants in the other case, brings an action in mandamus to compel defendants to transfer into her name the ownership of 22,500 shares of stock of defendant Pepsi Cola Bottling Company of Minneapolis and St. Paul and to issue a new certificate evidencing her ownership thereof. The same shares of stock were involved in the other action. The court discharged the writ in the instant case and dismissed the proceeding. Judgment was entered, and relator appealed.

Based on the decision in Costello v. Farrell, 234 Minn. 453, 48 N. W. (2d) 557, filed herewith, the judgment is reversed.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Costello v. Farrell
48 N.W.2d 557 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
48 N.W.2d 564, 234 Minn. 466, 1951 Minn. LEXIS 727, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-farrell-v-pepsi-cola-bottling-co-minn-1951.