State ex rel. Farmer v. McCormick

171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 530
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 23, 1961
DocketNo. 36678
StatusPublished

This text of 171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 530 (State ex rel. Farmer v. McCormick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Farmer v. McCormick, 171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 530 (Ohio 1961).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The relator had and exercised the adequate remedy of appeal from the order of dismissal to review the alleged errors complained of and cannot now have such a review by a proceeding in mandamus.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias, Bell, Herbert and O’Neill, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 530, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-farmer-v-mccormick-ohio-1961.