State ex rel. Fant v. Sykes

504 N.E.2d 1115, 29 Ohio St. 3d 17, 29 Ohio B. 235, 1987 Ohio LEXIS 236
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 11, 1987·No. No. 86-572·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant questions the adoption of the referee’s report by the court of appeals inasmuch as the report preceded the actual furnishing of the public record sought herein. Additionally, appellant points to a number of procedural defects at the referee’s level. The questions raised are moot because appellant has been furnished with the public record he is seeking.

For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the court of appeals granting summary judgment to the appellee, thus denying mandamus relief, is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur. Douglas, J., concurs in judgment only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Fant v. Sykes, 504 N.E.2d 1115, 29 Ohio St. 3d 17, 29 Ohio B. 235, 1987 Ohio LEXIS 236 (Ohio 1987).

504 N.E.2d 1115 (State ex rel. Fant v. Sykes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Mayrides v. City of Whitehall
580 N.E.2d 1089 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1991)