State ex rel. Fanning v. Mayor of Charleston

46 S.C.L. 480
CourtCourt of Appeals of South Carolina
DecidedJanuary 15, 1860
StatusPublished

This text of 46 S.C.L. 480 (State ex rel. Fanning v. Mayor of Charleston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Fanning v. Mayor of Charleston, 46 S.C.L. 480 (S.C. Ct. App. 1860).

Opinion

Curta, per O’Neall, C. J.

It is sufficient in this case to say, that the relators, inhabitants of the city, are amenable to the city authorities for offences against the city ordinances.

They have been tried in conformity thereto, and we cannot interfere.

For offences against the 'laws of the State, they are to be tried according to the Acts of the General Assembly.

The motion to reverse the decision below is dismissed.

Johnston and Wardlaw, JJ., concurred.

Motion dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
46 S.C.L. 480, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-fanning-v-mayor-of-charleston-scctapp-1860.