State ex rel. Fairport, Painesville & Eastern Railway Co. v. Common Pleas Court of Lake County

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Fairport, Painesville & Eastern Railway Co. v. Common Pleas Court of Lake County

375 N.E.2d 1249, 54 Ohio St. 2d 261, 8 Ohio Op. 3d 231, 1978 Ohio LEXIS 553

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMay 17, 1978

DocketNo. 77-576

StatusPublished

This text of 375 N.E.2d 1249 (State ex rel. Fairport, Painesville & Eastern Railway Co. v. Common Pleas Court of Lake County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Fairport, Painesville & Eastern Railway Co. v. Common Pleas Court of Lake County, 375 N.E.2d 1249, 54 Ohio St. 2d 261, 8 Ohio Op. 3d 231, 1978 Ohio LEXIS 553 (Ohio 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Relator contends that the Court of Common Pleas of Lake County is “clearly without jurisdiction”' to grant the relief sought in Diamond Shamrock’s declaratory judgment action and that relator is without an adequate remedy at law.

It is clear that the statutory authority for the Court of Common Pleas to hear declaratory judgment actions is contained in R. C. 2721.02.

“Whether to proceed in a declaratory relief action is a matter for the determination of the trial court in the first instance. Following such determination appropriate appellate procedures are available to the parties.” State, ex rel. Dickison, v. Court of Common Pleas (1971), 28 Ohio St. 2d 179, 180.

Accordingly, the writ of prohibition is denied.

Writ denied.

O’Neill, C. J., Herbert, Celebrezze, W. Brown, P. Brown, Sweenet and Locher, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI