State ex rel. Fairport, Painesville & Eastern Railway Co. v. Common Pleas Court of Lake County

375 N.E.2d 1249, 54 Ohio St. 2d 261, 8 Ohio Op. 3d 231, 1978 Ohio LEXIS 553
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 17, 1978·No. No. 77-576·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Relator contends that the Court of Common Pleas of Lake County is “clearly without jurisdiction”' to grant the relief sought in Diamond Shamrock’s declaratory judgment action and that relator is without an adequate remedy at law.

It is clear that the statutory authority for the Court of Common Pleas to hear declaratory judgment actions is contained in R. C. 2721.02.

“Whether to proceed in a declaratory relief action is a matter for the determination of the trial court in the first instance. Following such determination appropriate appellate procedures are available to the parties.” State, ex rel. Dickison, v. Court of Common Pleas (1971), 28 Ohio St. 2d 179, 180.

Accordingly, the writ of prohibition is denied.

Writ denied.

O’Neill, C. J., Herbert, Celebrezze, W. Brown, P. Brown, Sweenet and Locher, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Fairport, Painesville & Eastern Railway Co. v. Common Pleas Court of Lake County, 375 N.E.2d 1249, 54 Ohio St. 2d 261, 8 Ohio Op. 3d 231, 1978 Ohio LEXIS 553 (Ohio 1978).

375 N.E.2d 1249 (State ex rel. Fairport, Painesville & Eastern Railway Co. v. Common Pleas Court of Lake County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Dickison v. Court of Common Pleas
277 N.E.2d 210 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1971)