State ex rel. Fairfield Leader v. Ricketts

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Fairfield Leader v. Ricketts

544 N.E.2d 685, 46 Ohio St. 3d 601, 1989 Ohio LEXIS 251

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State ex rel. Fairfield Leader v. Ricketts. Read the opinion of the Court — 56 Ohio St. 3d 97 →

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided October 4, 1989·No. No. 89-550·Published

Opinions

This cause is before us on relator’s motion in limine for an order allowing it to depose Don S. McAuliffe regarding his alleged efforts to reserve the name “The Fairfield Leader” with the Secretary of State. The motion is granted. Also before us is a joint motion for a protective order filed by David L. Landefeld and Paul D. More-hart. Landefeld’s motion is granted. Morehart’s motion is denied insofar as it relates to his knowledge of the allegations about McAuliffe. It is granted in all other respects.

Moyer, C.J., Holmes, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur. Sweeney and Douglas, JJ., concur in part and dissent in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This cause is before us on relator’s motion in limine for an order allowing it to depose Don S. McAuliffe regarding his alleged efforts to reserve the name “The Fairfield Leader” with the Secretary of State. The motion is granted. Also before us is a joint motion for a protective order filed by David L. Landefeld and Paul D. More-hart. Landefeld’s motion is granted. Morehart’s motion is denied insofar as it relates to his knowledge of the allegations about McAuliffe. It is granted in all other respects.

Moyer, C.J., Holmes, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur. Sweeney and Douglas, JJ., concur in part and dissent in part.

State ex rel. Fairfield Leader v. Ricketts, 544 N.E.2d 685, 46 Ohio St. 3d 601, 1989 Ohio LEXIS 251 (Ohio 1989).

Pincite

544 N.E.2d 685 (State ex rel. Fairfield Leader v. Ricketts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.