State, ex rel. Faircloth v. Hollis

27 Fla. Supp. 15
CourtCircuit Court of the 2nd Judicial Circuit of Florida, Leon County
DecidedJuly 20, 1966
DocketNo. 11494
StatusPublished

This text of 27 Fla. Supp. 15 (State, ex rel. Faircloth v. Hollis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Circuit Court of the 2nd Judicial Circuit of Florida, Leon County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State, ex rel. Faircloth v. Hollis, 27 Fla. Supp. 15 (Fla. Super. Ct. 1966).

Opinion

W. MAY WALKER, Circuit Judge.

This cause coming on for final hearing and trial, and it appearing to the court that there are no issues of fact in this cause and that the only issues to be determined by the court are issues of law, and counsel for the parties having stipulated in open court that the cause is ready for final disposition by the court without testimony or other evidence by the parties, and the court being fully advised in the premises, it is ordered and adjudged —

(1) The court finds as relevant and material facts the following —

[17]*17(a) That the plaintiff, Earl Faircloth, as attorney general of the state of Florida is fully authorized under law to bring and prosecute this cause in the name of and for and in behalf of the state of Florida, and was and is fully justified in the bringing and prosecution thereof by reason of the public interest therein.

(b) That this court has jurisdiction of the parties and of the subject matter of this cause.

(c) That section 25 of article III of the constitution of the state of Florida as the same became effective January 1, 1887 provided —

Section 25. The legislature shall provide by general law for incorporating such educational, agricultural, mechanical, mining and other useful companies or associations as may be deemed necessary.

Thereafter by joint resolution no. 2, Acts of 1899, the legislature proposed and at the general election in 1900 the people of Florida adopted amended section 25 of article III of the constitution as follows—

Section 25. The legislature shall provide by general law for incorporating such educational, agricultural, mechanical, mining, and other useful companies or associations as may be deemed necessary; but it shall not pass any special law on any such subject and any such special law shall be of no effect; Provided, however, that nothing herein shall preclude special legislation as to a university or the public schools, or as to a ship canal across the state.

(d) That chapter 26, Laws of Florida, Acts of 1843, provides as follows —

An act to incorporate the Grand Lodge of Florida. Be it enacted by the Governor and Legislative Council of the Territory of Florida, That the Grand Master, the Deputy Grand Master, and the Grand Wardens of the Grand Lodge of Florida for the time being, and their successors in office, be, and they are hereby, declared to be a Body politic and corporate, by the name and style of the Grand Lodge of Florida, and as such shall be capable and liable in law, to sue and be sued, plead and be impleaded, and shall be capable of purchasing or accepting, and being invested with a title in real estate, of a lot or piece of parcel of land in the city of Tallahassee, on which to build or erect a Masonic Hall, or such other buildings and improvements as may be deemed needful, useful, and necessary, for the said Grand Lodge of Florida, and to sell and dispose of the same, or any part or parcel thereof, and make deed or deeds of conveyance for the same, and to purchase another lot or piece or parcel of land, if need be for the purpose of building and erecting a Grand Masonic Hall, for the use and property of the said Grand Lodge of Florida, and to do and perform all manner of things to and with the said lot, and piece or parcel of land and premises, that a natural person might of right do and perform.
Approved 14th March, 1843.

[18]*18(e) That chapter 4281, Laws of Florida, Acts of 1893, is entitled —

“An act to incorporate the Most Worshipful Grand Lodge of Free and Accepted Masons of Florida and all subordinate or particular Lodges Masonically chartered thereby ”

and said act provides that the grand master, the deputy grand master, and the grand wardens of the most worshipful grand lodge of free and accepted masons of the state of Florida, and their successors in office are declared to be a body politic and corporate by the name and style of “The Most Worshipful Grand Lodge of Free and Accepted Masons of Florida.” Said act further provides that such body corporate and politic shall be capable and liable in law to sue and be sued, to contract and be contracted with, to plead and be impleaded, and to acquire, own, hold, possess and convey property either real, personal or mixed, either by purchase, gift or devise; and to issue and grant masonic charters according to its own constitution, by-laws, rules and regulations to such subordinate, particular or individual lodges of free and accepted masons at such places in the state of Florida as it may see fit, and with full power according to its own constitution, rules, by-laws and regulations, at any time to recall, abrogate, revoke or annul for misuser or nonuser any such masonic charter that it may have issued or granted to any such subordinate, particular or individual lodge, or which it may hereafter issue or grant to any such particular, individual or subordinate lodges, and have perpetual succession.

Said act further provides that the worshipful master and junior and senior wardens, and their successors in office of any and all particular, individual or subordinate lodges of free and accepted masons that have heretofore, or which may hereafter be organized and masonically chartered in the state of Florida by said grand lodge, according to the constitution, by-laws and rules of such grand lodge, are declared to be separate and independent bodies, politic and corporate, under such general corporate names and styles as may be assigned to them respectively by such grand lodge with the right of corporate succession, so long as the masonic charters granted to them by such grand lodge shall remain unrevoked by such grand lodge; and as such, by their several and respective corporate names, shall have the power to contract and be contracted with; to sue and be sued, plead and be impleaded, and to acquire, own, hold, possess, and convey property of all kinds, real, personal and mixed, so long as their masonic charters shall remain unrevoked by such grand lodge; [19]*19and to elect their said corporate officers at such times and places as their own rules, regulations and by-laws not in conflict with the rules and regulations properly laid down for them by such grand lodge, may provide.

Said act further provides that whenever the masonic charter of any particular, individual or subordinate lodge shall be recalled, abrogated, revoked or annulled by said grand lodge, such particular or individual lodge shall cease to have corporate existence, except for the purpose of being sued for its legal obligations; and upon such cessation of its corporate existence all of its property, real, personal and mixed, shall revert to and belong to the said grand lodge, subject to any debts that may have been contracted by such particular or individual lodge, but such grand lodge shall in no event be responsible or liable for any indebtedness created by any particular individual or subordinate lodge.

Said act further provides that all charters of incorporation, whether by the general incorporation laws of this state, or by special acts of the legislature, heretofore granted or issued to any such particular, individual or subordinate lodges, are revoked, abrogated, annulled and repealed, and the provisions of this act shall stand in lieu thereof. Said act further specifically repeals chapter 26, Laws of Florida, Acts of 1843, above quoted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
27 Fla. Supp. 15, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-faircloth-v-hollis-flacirct2leo-1966.