State ex rel. Fagan v. Saffold
This text of 2014 Ohio 1089 (State ex rel. Fagan v. Saffold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as State ex rel. Fagan v. Saffold, 2014-Ohio-1089.]
Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA
JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 100882
STATE EX REL., JOHNATHAN FAGAN RELATOR
vs.
JUDGE SHIRLEY STRICKLAND SAFFOLD RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT: WRIT DENIED
Writ of Mandamus Motion No. 471929 Order No. 472676
RELEASE DATE: March 14, 2014 FOR RELATOR
Johnathan Fagan, pro se Inmate No. 602-079 Lake Erie Correctional Institution P.O. Box 8000 Conneaut, Ohio 44030-8000
ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT
Timothy J. McGinty Cuyahoga County Prosecutor By: James E. Moss Assistant County Prosecutor 8th Floor Justice Center 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio 44113 MARY EILEEN KILBANE, J.:
{¶1} On January 14, 2014, the relator, Johnathan Fagan, commenced this
mandamus action against the respondent, Judge Shirley Strickland Saffold, to compel the
judge to resolve the issue of jail-time credit, in the underlying case, State v. Fagan,
Cuyahoga C.P. No. CR-546219. On January 31, 2014, the respondent moved for
summary judgment on the grounds of mootness. Attached to the dispositive motion was
a certified copy of a signed and file-stamped January 22, 2014 journal entry granting 117
days of jail-time credit in the underlying case. Fagan did not timely file a response to
the motion for summary judgment. This establishes that the relator has received his
requested relief and that the action is, therefore, moot. State ex rel. Corder v. Wilson, 68
Ohio App.3d 567, 589 N.E.2d 113 (10th Dist.1991).
{¶2} Accordingly, the court grants the respondent’s motion for summary
judgment and denies the application for a writ of mandamus. Costs assessed against
respondent; costs waived. The clerk is directed to serve upon the parties notice of this
judgment and its date of entry upon the journal. Civ.R. 58(B).
{¶3} Writ denied.
MARY EILEEN KILBANE, JUDGE
SEAN C. GALLAGHER, P.J., and MELODY J. STEWART, J., CONCUR
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2014 Ohio 1089, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-fagan-v-saffold-ohioctapp-2014.