State ex rel. Estes v. Marriott
This text of 170 Ohio St. (N.S.) 46 (State ex rel. Estes v. Marriott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The question presented is whether the petition in this case is demurrable. This court is of the opinion that it is. It does not state operative facts which show that relator has no adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law.
A writ of prohibition will ordinarily not be allowed where there is an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law and may not be employed as a substitute for appeal. State, ex [48]*48rel. Rhodes, Aud., v. Solether, Judge, 162 Ohio St., 559, 124 N. E. (2d), 411.
Demurrer sustained and writ denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
170 Ohio St. (N.S.) 46, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-estes-v-marriott-ohio-1959.