State ex rel. Estate of Sziraki v. Admr., Bur. of Workers' Comp.

998 N.E.2d 1179, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1425
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 4, 2013·No. 2011-0799·Published

Opinion

Franklin App. No. 10AP-267, 2011-Ohio-1486.

On motion for reconsideration. Motion for reconsideration granted to the following extent:

Paragraph 17 of the opinion issued in this case is modified to read as follows:

{¶ 17} “Scheduled loss” benefits are paid to an injured worker for the loss or loss of use of a body part according to a schedule in R.C. 4123.57(B). State ex rel. Moorehead, v. Indus. Comm., 112 Ohio St.3d 27, 2006-Ohio-6364, 857 N.E.2d 1203; State ex rel. Miller v. Indus. Comm., 97 Ohio St.3d 418, 2002-Ohio-6664, 780 N.E.2d 268, ¶ 7.

O’Donnell, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Estate of Sziraki v. Admr., Bur. of Workers' Comp., 998 N.E.2d 1179, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1425 (Ohio 2013).

998 N.E.2d 1179 (State ex rel. Estate of Sziraki v. Admr., Bur. of Workers' Comp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Moorehead v. Industrial Commission
857 N.E.2d 1203 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2006)
State ex rel. Miller v. Indus. Comm.
2002 Ohio 6664 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2002)