State ex rel. Essex v. Riley

364 N.E.2d 1139, 51 Ohio St. 2d 44, 5 Ohio Op. 3d 24, 1977 Ohio LEXIS 437
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided July 6, 1977·No. No. 77-97·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Although the parties do not mention the. matter in their briefs, we take judicial notice of the fact that relator, Mr. Martin W. Essex, is no longer the Ohio Superintendent of Public Instruction. Since Essex was a defendant in the pending action only in his official capacity and has no present interest in the litigation, no current reason exists which would require the imposition of the extraordinary remedy of prohibition in his behalf.

The motion for a permanent writ is denied.

Writ denied.

Celebrezze, P. Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur. O’Neill, C. J., and Herbert, J., dissent. W. Brown, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Essex v. Riley, 364 N.E.2d 1139, 51 Ohio St. 2d 44, 5 Ohio Op. 3d 24, 1977 Ohio LEXIS 437 (Ohio 1977).

364 N.E.2d 1139 (State ex rel. Essex v. Riley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State, Dept. of Mental Health v. Reynolds
454 N.E.2d 154 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1982)