State ex rel. Essex v. Riley
This text of 364 N.E.2d 1139 (State ex rel. Essex v. Riley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Although the parties do not mention the. matter in their briefs, we take judicial notice of the fact that relator, Mr. Martin W. Essex, is no longer the Ohio Superintendent of Public Instruction. Since Essex was a defendant in the pending action only in his official capacity and has no present interest in the litigation, no current reason exists which would require the imposition of the extraordinary remedy of prohibition in his behalf.
The motion for a permanent writ is denied.
Writ denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
364 N.E.2d 1139, 51 Ohio St. 2d 44, 5 Ohio Op. 3d 24, 1977 Ohio LEXIS 437, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-essex-v-riley-ohio-1977.