State ex rel. Enquirer v. Cincinnati Police Dept.

92 N.E.3d 874, 2018 Ohio 723, 152 Ohio St. 3d 1402
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 28, 2018
Docket2017–1618
StatusPublished

This text of 92 N.E.3d 874 (State ex rel. Enquirer v. Cincinnati Police Dept.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Enquirer v. Cincinnati Police Dept., 92 N.E.3d 874, 2018 Ohio 723, 152 Ohio St. 3d 1402 (Ohio 2018).

Opinion

MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS

In Mandamus. On answer of respondent. Sua sponte, alternative writ granted. The following briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 12.05.

The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present within 20 days; relator shall file a brief within 10 days after the filing of the evidence; respondent shall file a brief within 20 days after the filing of relator's brief; and relator may file a reply brief within 7 days after the filing of respondent's brief.

Respondent shall file unredacted version of body-cam video for in camera review at the time for filing evidence in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
92 N.E.3d 874, 2018 Ohio 723, 152 Ohio St. 3d 1402, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-enquirer-v-cincinnati-police-dept-ohio-2018.