State ex rel. Enquirer v. Cincinnati Police Dept.

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Enquirer v. Cincinnati Police Dept.

92 N.E.3d 874, 2018 Ohio 723, 152 Ohio St. 3d 1402

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 28, 2018·No. 2017–1618·Published

Opinion

MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS

In Mandamus. On answer of respondent. Sua sponte, alternative writ granted. The following briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 12.05.

The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present within 20 days; relator shall file a brief within 10 days after the filing of the evidence; respondent shall file a brief within 20 days after the filing of relator's brief; and relator may file a reply brief within 7 days after the filing of respondent's brief.

Respondent shall file unredacted version of body-cam video for in camera review at the time for filing evidence in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS

In Mandamus. On answer of respondent. Sua sponte, alternative writ granted. The following briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 12.05.

The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present within 20 days; relator shall file a brief within 10 days after the filing of the evidence; respondent shall file a brief within 20 days after the filing of relator's brief; and relator may file a reply brief within 7 days after the filing of respondent's brief.

Respondent shall file unredacted version of body-cam video for in camera review at the time for filing evidence in this case.

State ex rel. Enquirer v. Cincinnati Police Dept., 92 N.E.3d 874, 2018 Ohio 723, 152 Ohio St. 3d 1402 (Ohio 2018).

Pincite

92 N.E.3d 874 (State ex rel. Enquirer v. Cincinnati Police Dept.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.