State ex rel. Emswiler v. Licking Cty. Bd. of Elections

93 Ohio St. 3d 1305
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 5, 2001
Docket01-1951
StatusPublished

This text of 93 Ohio St. 3d 1305 (State ex rel. Emswiler v. Licking Cty. Bd. of Elections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Emswiler v. Licking Cty. Bd. of Elections, 93 Ohio St. 3d 1305 (Ohio 2001).

Opinion

Licking App. No. 01CA98. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Licking County. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for injunction pending appeal,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion be, and hereby is, denied.

Pfeifek, J., concurs, noting that relators should seek relief in declaratory judgment and prohibitory injunction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
93 Ohio St. 3d 1305, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-emswiler-v-licking-cty-bd-of-elections-ohio-2001.