State ex rel. Employers Liability Assurance Co. v. Fisher

Supreme Court of Missouri

State ex rel. Employers Liability Assurance Co. v. Fisher

143 S.W. 501, 239 Mo. 192, 1912 Mo. LEXIS 75

Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided January 27, 1912·Published

Opinion

WOODSON, J.

— This case was by consent of parties submitted with the case of State ex rel. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Grimm, decided In Banc at the present term, and reported at page 135 of this report.

After a careful investigation of the facts and law of the case, we are satisfied that there is nothing in it to distinguish it from the Pacific Mutual case. We are of the opinion that the conclusions announced in that case are controlling in this. We, therefore, deny the peremptory writ of prohibition, and quash the preliminary rule heretofore issued.

All concur except Valliant, G. J., and Graves, J., who dissent in a separate opinion by the latter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WOODSON, J.

— This case was by consent of parties submitted with the case of State ex rel. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Grimm, decided In Banc at the present term, and reported at page 135 of this report.

After a careful investigation of the facts and law of the case, we are satisfied that there is nothing in it to distinguish it from the Pacific Mutual case. We are of the opinion that the conclusions announced in that case are controlling in this. We, therefore, deny the peremptory writ of prohibition, and quash the preliminary rule heretofore issued.

All concur except Valliant, G. J., and Graves, J., who dissent in a separate opinion by the latter.

State ex rel. Employers Liability Assurance Co. v. Fisher, 143 S.W. 501, 239 Mo. 192, 1912 Mo. LEXIS 75 (Mo. 1912).

Pincite

143 S.W. 501 (State ex rel. Employers Liability Assurance Co. v. Fisher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.