State ex rel. Emanuel v. Cooper

152 So. 2d 471, 1963 Fla. LEXIS 3206
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided April 24, 1963·No. No. 32020·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER -CURIAM.

The decision of the district court from which this appeal is prosecuted is one dismissing a suggestion of prohibition without opinion or comment. The decision is not one which, under the constitution, may be the subject of a direct appeal to this Court. Therefore, the appeal must be and the same hereby is dismissed.

This dismissal, however, is without prejudice to appellant’s right to assert his alleged immunity to prosecution under the information described in the suggestion for writ of prohibition in the trial court or by peti[472] tion for writ of habeas corpus to any court having jurisdiction thereof.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C. J., and DREW, THOR-NAL, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Emanuel v. Cooper, 152 So. 2d 471, 1963 Fla. LEXIS 3206 (Fla. 1963).

152 So. 2d 471 (State ex rel. Emanuel v. Cooper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Callendar v. State
181 So. 2d 529 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1966)