State ex rel. Ellison v. Dresbach

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Ellison v. Dresbach

450 N.E.2d 1174, 6 Ohio St. 3d 19, 6 Ohio B. 16, 1983 Ohio LEXIS 767

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 13, 1983

DocketNo. 82-1318

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 450 N.E.2d 1174 (State ex rel. Ellison v. Dresbach) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Ellison v. Dresbach, 450 N.E.2d 1174, 6 Ohio St. 3d 19, 6 Ohio B. 16, 1983 Ohio LEXIS 767 (Ohio 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

App. R. 9(E) provides the procedure for the correction or modification of a trial court record. If there is a material omission or misstatement, then the issue may be resolved by either the trial court, the court of appeals, or by stipulation of the parties.

The materials submitted by appellant to this court do not reflect that he attempted to use the procedure provided in the Rules of Appellate Procedure, nor do they indicate that any specific part of the record allegedly omitted was brought to the attention of the court of appeals so as to afford a basis for legitimate inquiry.

Appellant, having failed to show that he is entitled to the relief requested, the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing appellant’s complaint is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Celebrezze, C.J., W. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI