State ex rel. Ellis v. Smith Agricultural Chemical Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Ellis v. Smith Agricultural Chemical Co.

80 Ohio St. (N.S.) 754

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJune 25, 1909

DocketNo. 11330

StatusPublished

This text of 80 Ohio St. (N.S.) 754 (State ex rel. Ellis v. Smith Agricultural Chemical Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Ellis v. Smith Agricultural Chemical Co., 80 Ohio St. (N.S.) 754 (Ohio 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

Answer of defendant withdrawn by leave of court, and defendant not desiring to plead further, it is adjudged and decreed that said defendant. The [755]*755Smith Agricultural Chemical Company, be forever disbarred and. prohibited from maintaining, promoting, organizing or owning directly or indirectly any and all subsidiary companies, corporations or associations for the purpose of engaging in the business of manufacturing or selling commercial fertilizer, and from doing any and all other things as alleged in the petition or otherwise contrary to or in violation of any and all of the provisions of law regulating the manufacture and sale, or either of them, of commercial fertilizer.

Crew, C. J., Summers, Spear, Davis, Shaucic and Price, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Answer of defendant withdrawn by leave of court, and defendant not desiring to plead further, it is adjudged and decreed that said defendant. The [755]*755Smith Agricultural Chemical Company, be forever disbarred and. prohibited from maintaining, promoting, organizing or owning directly or indirectly any and all subsidiary companies, corporations or associations for the purpose of engaging in the business of manufacturing or selling commercial fertilizer, and from doing any and all other things as alleged in the petition or otherwise contrary to or in violation of any and all of the provisions of law regulating the manufacture and sale, or either of them, of commercial fertilizer.

Crew, C. J., Summers, Spear, Davis, Shaucic and Price, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

80 Ohio St. (N.S.) 754, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-ellis-v-smith-agricultural-chemical-co-ohio-1909.