State ex rel. Elias v. Tibbals
This text of 2011 Ohio 5678 (State ex rel. Elias v. Tibbals) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as State ex rel. Elias v. Tibbals, 2011-Ohio-5678.]
Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA
JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 96832
STATE OF OHIO, EX REL., JOHN ELIAS RELATOR
vs.
TERRY TIBBALS, WARDEN, ET AL. RESPONDENTS
JUDGMENT: COMPLAINT DISMISSED
Writ of Mandamus Motion No. 447025 Order No. 448492
RELEASED DATE: October 28, 2011 -i- 2
FOR RELATOR
John Elias Inmate No. 512-026 Mansfield Correctional Inst. P. O. Box 788 Mansfield, Ohio 44901-0788
FOR RESPONDENTS Warden Terry Tibbals:
Peter L. Jamison Assistant Attorney General Criminal Justice Section 150 E. Gay Street, 16th Floor Columbus, Ohio 43215
Bureau of Sentence Computation:
Michael DeWine Ohio Attorney General 30 East Broad Street State Office Tower, 17th floor Columbus, Ohio 43215
PATRICIA ANN BLACKMON, P.J.:
{¶ 1} John Elias has filed a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Elias seeks an
order from this court, which requires the Warden of the Mansfield Correctional
Institution, Terry Tibbals, and the Ohio Bureau of Sentence Computation to recalculate 3
the date of his release from prison.1 The complaint for mandamus is dismissed because it
is defective.
{¶ 2} R.C. 2969.25(C) mandates that an inmate, who files a civil action or appeal
against a government entity or employee and seeks a waiver of the prepayment of the
filing fees assessed by the court in which the action or appeal is filed, shall file with the
complaint or notice of appeal an affidavit of indigency that includes a statement setting
forth the balance in his inmate account for each of the preceding six months, as certified
by the institutional cashier.
{¶ 3} The Supreme Court of Ohio, with regard to the mandatory
affidavit/institutional cashier statement requirements of R.C. 2969.25(C), has recently
established that:
{¶ 4} “We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the petition of
appellant, * * *, for a writ of habeas corpus to compel his release from prison. As the
court of appeals correctly held, [appellant’s] petition was defective because although he
filed an affidavit of indigency and sought waiver of prepayment of the court’s filing fees,
he failed to include in his affidavit of indigency a statement setting forth the balance in
his inmate account for each of the preceding six months, as certified by the institutional
cashier, in violation of R.C. 2969.25(C). ‘The requirements of R.C. 2969.25 are
1Pursuantto Civ.R. 21, Mark Tibbals is replaced with Terry Tibbals, the present warden of the Mansfield Correctional Institution. 4
mandatory, and failure to comply with them subjects an inmate’s action to
dismissal.’ State ex rel. White v. Bechtel, 99 Ohio St.3d 11, 2003-Ohio-2262, 788
N.E.2d 634, ¶5. [Appellant’s] subsequent filing of the statement did not cure the
defect. See R.C. 2969.25(C); see also Fuqua v. Williams, 100 Ohio St.3d 211,
2003-Ohio-5533, 797 N.E.2d 982, ¶9. * * *.” Hazel v. Knab, Ohio Supreme Court Slip
Opinion No. 2011-Ohio-4608, ¶1. (Emphasis added.)
{¶ 5} Herein, Elias has failed to comply with the mandatory requirements of R.C.
2969.25(C) because he has not provided this court with a sworn affidavit that sets forth
the balance in his inmate account for each of the preceding six months, as certified by the
institutional cashier of the Mansfield Correctional Institution. In addition, Elias is
unable to cure the defective complaint for a writ of mandamus vis-a-vis an amended
complaint. See Hazel, supra.
{¶ 6} Accordingly, we dismiss the complaint for a writ of mandamus. Costs to
Elias. It is further ordered that the Clerk of the Eighth District Court of Appeals serve
notice of this judgment upon all parties as required by Civ.R. 58(B).
Complaint dismissed.
________________________________________________ PATRICIA ANN BLACKMON, PRESIDING JUDGE
JAMES J. SWEENEY, J., and KENNETH A. ROCCO, J., CONCUR
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2011 Ohio 5678, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-elias-v-tibbals-ohioctapp-2011.