State ex rel. Elfer v. Millsaps

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Elfer v. Millsaps

71 So. 499, 139 La. 250, 1916 La. LEXIS 1780

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedApril 8, 1916

DocketNo. 21900

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 71 So. 499 (State ex rel. Elfer v. Millsaps) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Elfer v. Millsaps, 71 So. 499, 139 La. 250, 1916 La. LEXIS 1780 (La. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

O’NIELL, J.

The pleadings and issues presented in this case are the same as in the case of State ex rel. D. C. Labbe et al. v. W. F. Millsaps. Secretary of State, No. 21901, 71 South. 496,¹ decided this day, except that the relators in this case are not the same individuals. They are Charles Elfer, candidate for [252]*252sheriff, and Ortman W. Crawford,, candidate for representative, of the parish of St. Charles.

For the reasons assigned in the case of State ex rel. D. C. Labbe et al. v. W. F. Millsaps, Secretary of State, In re State ex rel. Progressive Party of the State of Louisiana et al., 71 South. 496,¹ applying for a writ of mandamus, it is ordered that'the relief prayed for in this case be denied, and that the relators’ application be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

O’NIELL, J.

The pleadings and issues presented in this case are the same as in the case of State ex rel. D. C. Labbe et al. v. W. F. Millsaps. Secretary of State, No. 21901, 71 South. 496,¹ decided this day, except that the relators in this case are not the same individuals. They are Charles Elfer, candidate for [252]*252sheriff, and Ortman W. Crawford,, candidate for representative, of the parish of St. Charles.

For the reasons assigned in the case of State ex rel. D. C. Labbe et al. v. W. F. Millsaps, Secretary of State, In re State ex rel. Progressive Party of the State of Louisiana et al., 71 South. 496,¹ applying for a writ of mandamus, it is ordered that'the relief prayed for in this case be denied, and that the relators’ application be dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

71 So. 499, 139 La. 250, 1916 La. LEXIS 1780, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-elfer-v-millsaps-la-1916.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack