State ex rel. Edmondson v. Frizzell

Court on the Judiciary of Oklahoma

State ex rel. Edmondson v. Frizzell

37 P.3d 979, 2001 Okl Jud. 1, 2001 Okla. JUD LEXIS 1, 2001 WL 1518764

CourtCourt on the Judiciary of Oklahoma

DecidedNovember 27, 2001

DocketNo. CJAD-2000-2

StatusPublished

This text of 37 P.3d 979 (State ex rel. Edmondson v. Frizzell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court on the Judiciary of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Edmondson v. Frizzell, 37 P.3d 979, 2001 Okl Jud. 1, 2001 Okla. JUD LEXIS 1, 2001 WL 1518764 (Okla. Super. Ct. 2001).

Pincite

Opinions

ORDER

HAL WM. ELLIS, Vice Presiding Judge.

T1 Respondent seeks attorney fees and costs relating to his defense of an unsuceessful action before the Court on the Judiciary, under the authority of City Natl Bank and Trust Co. of Oklahoma City v. Owens, 565 P.2d 4 (Okla.1977), citing patently insufficient allegations contained in the Attorney General's petition.

12 Owens provides that a court has inherent equitable authority to award limited attorney fees against a party who has caused the wasted expenditures where that party has acted "in bad faith, vexatiously, wantonly, or for oppressive reason[.]"

4 3 The Application for Attorney Fees and Costs is denied. The record does not establish that the action against Respondent was brought in bad faith or was vexatious, wanton or oppressive.

14 ELLIS, V.P.J., BOUDREAU, J., LUMPKIN, J., THOMPSON, J., and WINCHESTER, J., concur. 11 5 WINSLOW, J., disqualified. I 6 LANNING, J., LINDLEY, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI