State ex rel. Eddy v. Clark

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Eddy v. Clark

694 N.E.2d 78, 82 Ohio St. 3d 1417, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 1551

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMay 21, 1998

Docket98-903

StatusPublished

This text of 694 N.E.2d 78 (State ex rel. Eddy v. Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Eddy v. Clark, 694 N.E.2d 78, 82 Ohio St. 3d 1417, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 1551 (Ohio 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition. Upon consideration of relator’s motion for stay and motion to expedite consideration of motion for stay,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., would grant a peremptory writ allowing interview under controlled circumstances.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition. Upon consideration of relator’s motion for stay and motion to expedite consideration of motion for stay,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., would grant a peremptory writ allowing interview under controlled circumstances.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

694 N.E.2d 78, 82 Ohio St. 3d 1417, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 1551, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-eddy-v-clark-ohio-1998.