State ex rel. Eckert v. Board of Aldermen

147 A. 380, 7 N.J. Misc. 850, 1929 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 150
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedOctober 3, 1929
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 147 A. 380 (State ex rel. Eckert v. Board of Aldermen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Eckert v. Board of Aldermen, 147 A. 380, 7 N.J. Misc. 850, 1929 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 150 (N.J. 1929).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This writ of certiorari brings up for review a resolution of the board of aldermen of the city of Paterson appointing .commissioners to divide the city of Paterson into wards. The action of the city is based upon chapter 264 of the laws of 1929, which grants power to change ward lines to “any municipality having a board of aldermen.” This classification contravenes article 4, section 7, subdivision 11 of the constitution of the state. See Ross v. Winsor, 48 N. J. L. 96; Dobbins v. Long Branch, 59 Id. 146; Delaware River Transportation Co. v. Trenton, 86 Id. 48; affirmed, 86 Id. 679, and Hueston v. Atwater, 97 Id. 414.

This view makes it unnecessary to consider the other points raised.

The resolution will be set aside.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Peck v. Township of New Barbadoes
176 A. 317 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
147 A. 380, 7 N.J. Misc. 850, 1929 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 150, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-eckert-v-board-of-aldermen-nj-1929.