State Ex Rel. Eaton v. Heath

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

State Ex Rel. Eaton v. Heath

1913 OK 225, 131 P. 685, 37 Okla. 187, 1913 Okla. LEXIS 173

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedApril 4, 1913

Docket2549

StatusPublished

This text of 1913 OK 225 (State Ex Rel. Eaton v. Heath) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State Ex Rel. Eaton v. Heath, 1913 OK 225, 131 P. 685, 37 Okla. 187, 1913 Okla. LEXIS 173 (Okla. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

HAEEISON, C.

This action was begun by Joe S. Eaton, county attorney of Okmulgee county, in May, 1910, against Eobert Heath, for using and permitting to be used, certain premises in the town of Morris, in 'Okmulgee county, for the purpose of keeping and dispensing intoxicating liquors in violation of law. Defendant demurred to the petition, on the ground that it failed to state a cause of action. The county attorney refused to plead further and appealed to this court.

The petition in error and case-made was filed .here May 26, 1911. The cause was assigned for submission December 6, 1912. No briefs having been filed, the appeal is deemed to have been abandoned, and the cause should be dismissed for failure to file briefs, as required by the rules of this court.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

HAEEISON, C.

This action was begun by Joe S. Eaton, county attorney of Okmulgee county, in May, 1910, against Eobert Heath, for using and permitting to be used, certain premises in the town of Morris, in 'Okmulgee county, for the purpose of keeping and dispensing intoxicating liquors in violation of law. Defendant demurred to the petition, on the ground that it failed to state a cause of action. The county attorney refused to plead further and appealed to this court.

The petition in error and case-made was filed .here May 26, 1911. The cause was assigned for submission December 6, 1912. No briefs having been filed, the appeal is deemed to have been abandoned, and the cause should be dismissed for failure to file briefs, as required by the rules of this court.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1913 OK 225, 131 P. 685, 37 Okla. 187, 1913 Okla. LEXIS 173, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-eaton-v-heath-okla-1913.