State Ex Rel. Eastman v. Stuart

186 N.E. 735, 126 Ohio St. 644, 126 Ohio St. (N.S.) 644, 1933 Ohio LEXIS 370
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 24, 1933·No. 24124·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

This cause came on to be heard upon the demurrer of the respondents to the relator’s petition. On consideration whereof it is ordered and adjudged that said demurrer be, and the same hereby is, sustained upon the authority of Silliman v. Court of Common Pleas of Williams County, ante, 338.

Ibis also ordered that the relator be granted twenty days to plead further and if no amended petition be *645 filed within such time this action is ordered dismissed at the relator’s costs.

Demurrer sustained.

Weygandt, C. J., Day, Allen, ' Stephenson and Jones, JJ., concur. Matthias, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State Ex Rel. Eastman v. Stuart, 186 N.E. 735, 126 Ohio St. 644, 126 Ohio St. (N.S.) 644, 1933 Ohio LEXIS 370 (Ohio 1933).

186 N.E. 735 (State Ex Rel. Eastman v. Stuart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stivison v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
1997 Ohio 321 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1997)
Picchetti v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.
153 N.E.2d 209 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1957)
Johnson v. Industrial Commission
164 Ohio St. (N.S.) 297 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1955)
Sebek v. Cleveland Graphite Bronze Co.
76 N.E.2d 892 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1947)
State v. McNary
4 N.E.2d 264 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1936)
Industrial Commission v. Ackerman
199 N.E. 857 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1935)
Industrial Commission v. Bartholome
190 N.E. 193 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1934)