State ex rel. Eager v. City of Hackensack

196 A. 739, 119 N.J.L. 430, 1938 N.J. LEXIS 299
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 26, 1938·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — -The Chancelloe, Paekee, Lloyd, Bodine, Donges, Heteield, Deae, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeeety, Walkee, JJ. 11.

For reversal — Hehee, J. 1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Eager v. City of Hackensack, 196 A. 739, 119 N.J.L. 430, 1938 N.J. LEXIS 299 (N.J. 1938).

196 A. 739 (State ex rel. Eager v. City of Hackensack) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.