State ex rel. Eager v. City of Hackensack
196 A. 739, 119 N.J.L. 430, 1938 N.J. LEXIS 299
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — -The Chancelloe, Paekee, Lloyd, Bodine, Donges, Heteield, Deae, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeeety, Walkee, JJ. 11.
For reversal — Hehee, J. 1.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State ex rel. Eager v. City of Hackensack, 196 A. 739, 119 N.J.L. 430, 1938 N.J. LEXIS 299 (N.J. 1938).
196 A. 739 (State ex rel. Eager v. City of Hackensack) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.