State ex rel. Dyer v. Owens

Indiana Supreme Court

State ex rel. Dyer v. Owens

6 Blackf. 61

DecidedNovember 15, 1841

StatusPublished

This text of 6 Blackf. 61 (State ex rel. Dyer v. Owens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Dyer v. Owens, 6 Blackf. 61 (Ind. 1841).

Pincite

Opinion

RECOGNIZANCE entered into before a justice of the peace of Clay county in a case of bastardy. The recognizance recited that Isabel Dyer, an unmarried woman of Jackson township in said county, in her examination on oath taken in writing before said justice, had declared that she was on, &c., delivered of a male bastard child, and that William Owens was the father of the child—and was conditioned for the reputed father’s appearance, at the next term of the Circuit Court, to answer the accusation and abide the judgment of the Court. Held, that the recognizance was sufficient.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RECOGNIZANCE entered into before a justice of the peace of Clay county in a case of bastardy. The recognizance recited that Isabel Dyer, an unmarried woman of Jackson township in said county, in her examination on oath taken in writing before said justice, had declared that she was on, &c., delivered of a male bastard child, and that William Owens was the father of the child—and was conditioned for the reputed father’s appearance, at the next term of the Circuit Court, to answer the accusation and abide the judgment of the Court. Held, that the recognizance was sufficient.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 Blackf. 61, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-dyer-v-owens-ind-1841.