State ex rel. Durkin v. Mahoning Cty. Bd. of Elections

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Durkin v. Mahoning Cty. Bd. of Elections

673 N.E.2d 927, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1508

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 2, 1997

Docket96-2572

StatusPublished

This text of 673 N.E.2d 927 (State ex rel. Durkin v. Mahoning Cty. Bd. of Elections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Durkin v. Mahoning Cty. Bd. of Elections, 673 N.E.2d 927, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1508 (Ohio 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

Mahoning App. No. 96 C.A. 178. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court [1509]*1509of Appeals for Mahoning County. Upon consideration of the motion of appellee, John M. Durkin, to dissolve the stay issued by the court of appeals and motion to expedite briefing schedule and the motion for leave to intervene as an appellant by Secretary of State, Bob Taft,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to dissolve the stay issued by the court of appeals be, and hereby is, granted.

Pfeifer, J., dissents.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the motion to expedite briefing schedule be, and hereby is, denied.

Moyer, C.J., dissents.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the motion for leave to intervene be, and hereby is, denied.

Douglas, Pfeifer and Stratton, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI