State ex rel. Dunning v. Kimbler

848 N.E.2d 855, 109 Ohio St. 3d 1491
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJune 7, 2006
Docket2006-0845
StatusPublished

This text of 848 N.E.2d 855 (State ex rel. Dunning v. Kimbler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Dunning v. Kimbler, 848 N.E.2d 855, 109 Ohio St. 3d 1491 (Ohio 2006).

Opinion

In Prohibition. On motion to dismiss and motion for sanctions. Motion to dismiss granted.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.

Motion for sanctions granted. Respondent shall file a bill and documentation in support of an award for attorney fees, in accordance with the guidelines set forth in DR 2-106, within 20 days. The bill and documentation should detail the expenses and approximate amount of compensation and fringe benefits, if any, that have been or will be paid to counsel in connection with defending respondent in this frivolous prohibition action. Relator may file objections to respondent’s bill and documentation [1492]*1492within 10 days of the filing of the bill and documentation, and respondent may file a reply to relator’s objections, if any, within 5 days of the filing of the objections.

O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., would deny the motion for sanctions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
848 N.E.2d 855, 109 Ohio St. 3d 1491, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-dunning-v-kimbler-ohio-2006.