State ex rel. Dunn v. Treacy

Montana Supreme Court

State ex rel. Dunn v. Treacy

185 P. 774, 55 Mont. 620, 1919 Mont. LEXIS 126

CourtMontana Supreme Court

DecidedApril 5, 1919

DocketNo. 4,395; No. 4,396

StatusPublished

This text of 185 P. 774 (State ex rel. Dunn v. Treacy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Dunn v. Treacy, 185 P. 774, 55 Mont. 620, 1919 Mont. LEXIS 126 (Mo. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

PEE CUEIAM'.

This cause having this day, after taking of proof and hearing arguments of counsel for respective parties, been submitted for judgment and decision, the court, after due consideration, being of opinion that within the time intervening between the hour of submission (at about 4:30 in the afternoon of Saturday, April 5, 1919), and the day of election (the Monday following, April 7, 1919), it could not intelligently examine [621]*621and determine the important questions presented by counsel, and for the further reason that after said election such questions would be only moot questions, hereby orders and adjudges that the above causes be dismissed.

Messrs. Wheeler & Baldwin and Messrs. Nolan & Donovan, for Relators. Mr. Henry C. Smith, Mr. William T. Pigott, Mr. D. M. Kelly, and Mr. William Meyer, for Respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PEE CUEIAM'.

This cause having this day, after taking of proof and hearing arguments of counsel for respective parties, been submitted for judgment and decision, the court, after due consideration, being of opinion that within the time intervening between the hour of submission (at about 4:30 in the afternoon of Saturday, April 5, 1919), and the day of election (the Monday following, April 7, 1919), it could not intelligently examine [621]*621and determine the important questions presented by counsel, and for the further reason that after said election such questions would be only moot questions, hereby orders and adjudges that the above causes be dismissed.

Messrs. Wheeler & Baldwin and Messrs. Nolan & Donovan, for Relators. Mr. Henry C. Smith, Mr. William T. Pigott, Mr. D. M. Kelly, and Mr. William Meyer, for Respondent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

185 P. 774, 55 Mont. 620, 1919 Mont. LEXIS 126, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-dunn-v-treacy-mont-1919.