State ex rel. Dunham v. Board of Education
This text of 154 Ohio St. (N.S.) 469 (State ex rel. Dunham v. Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The respondent has authority under the provisions of Section 4838-5, General Code, to adopt a rule excluding from the public schools within its district children who have not been vaccinated. The enforcement of such a rule is not a violation of the constitutional right to religious freedom. State, ex rel. Milhoof, v. Board of Education of Village of Barberton, 76 Ohio St., 297, 81 N. E., 568.
It clearly appears from the record that the board of education has performed its full duty as prescribed by existing statutes.
The judgment of the Court of Appeals is, therefore, affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
154 Ohio St. (N.S.) 469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-dunham-v-board-of-education-ohio-1951.