State ex rel. Dubos v. City of New Orleans

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Dubos v. City of New Orleans

97 So. 445, 154 La. 287, 1923 La. LEXIS 1925

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJuly 11, 1923

DocketNo. 25592

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 97 So. 445 (State ex rel. Dubos v. City of New Orleans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Dubos v. City of New Orleans, 97 So. 445, 154 La. 287, 1923 La. LEXIS 1925 (La. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

O’NIELL, C. J.

This is one of the cases referred to in our opinion handed down to-day in the case of State ex rel. Civello v. City of New Orleans (No. 25566) 97 South. 440,¹ wjiere the issues presented in this case were decided. The “civil district court gave judgment in favor of the relators, in this mandamus proceeding, commanding the municipal authorities to issue to the relators, Louis and Emile Dubos, a permit to renovate their building at 7457 St. Charles avenue and to convert it into a grocery store, and to issue a permit to the relator, Piggly-Wiggly Stores, Inc., to conduct a grocery store on the premises. The business is forbidden there by .municipal Ordinances No. 4655, No. 5653, and No. 5684.

For the reasons given in Civello’s Case,

The judgmeht appealed from is annulled, and relators’ demands are rejected, and their suit is dismissed, at their cost.

ROGERS, J., takes no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

O’NIELL, C. J.

This is one of the cases referred to in our opinion handed down to-day in the case of State ex rel. Civello v. City of New Orleans (No. 25566) 97 South. 440,¹ wjiere the issues presented in this case were decided. The “civil district court gave judgment in favor of the relators, in this mandamus proceeding, commanding the municipal authorities to issue to the relators, Louis and Emile Dubos, a permit to renovate their building at 7457 St. Charles avenue and to convert it into a grocery store, and to issue a permit to the relator, Piggly-Wiggly Stores, Inc., to conduct a grocery store on the premises. The business is forbidden there by .municipal Ordinances No. 4655, No. 5653, and No. 5684.

For the reasons given in Civello’s Case,

The judgmeht appealed from is annulled, and relators’ demands are rejected, and their suit is dismissed, at their cost.

ROGERS, J., takes no part.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

97 So. 445, 154 La. 287, 1923 La. LEXIS 1925, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-dubos-v-city-of-new-orleans-la-1923.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack